On the news that AG Garland has tested positive for C19,

“Attorney General Garland this afternoon tested positive for COVID-19 through antigen tests. He asked to be tested after learning that he may have been exposed to the virus. At the time, he is not experiencing symptoms. The Attorney General is fully vaccinated and boosted.”

here’s what this REALLY means:

He was treated with a product the primary mechanism of action of which is to invade healthy cells throughout the body and carry into them the RNA of a biologically active Covid gene, the so-called spike protein.

This is EXACTLY the same mechanism of viral infection. One consequence of this, both inevitable and intentional, is the hijacking of healthy cells to produce in an uncontrolled manner a very large number of a single biologically-active viral protein.

Newly assembled viruses inside cells can get out either by exocytosis or by lysis and destruction of the host cells.

The single C19 protein cannot exit by exocytosis. This leaves only 1 of 2 ways to get out:

1. It can stress the cell to the point it kills it and then is free to enter the extracellular space and be detectable and attacked by the innate immune system. A consequence of this is antigen presenting cells training the T and B cells of the adaptive immune system to produce a limited number of antibodies to epitopes on the single protein.

2. As with an actual viral infection, the viral RNA inside the cell can be detected by the innate immune system and trigger an innate immune inflammatory response. The viral protein inside the cell can also be spotted and trigger an innate immune response. But the presence of both of them signals to the innate immune system that cells are virally-infected and in the most serious stage of viral infection: viral proliferation.

When cells in many different tissues of organ systems throughout the body suddenly appear to be compromised by a widely disseminated viral infection and cause it to respond at the most serious and dangerous levels of inflammatory immune response in order to kill all the apparently virally-infected cells, with collateral, sometimes fatal, damage to tissues.

So, anyone “vaccinated” with these products will undergo innate immune-driven responses and appear to be virally-infected. For certain, they will experience exactly the same immune-consequences that anyone with the actual C19 virus will experience, except worse because a far wider range and location of cells are involved.

If given an antibody test, he will test positive. The utterly incorrect conclusion will be that he has been infected by a native C19 virus.

The very common phenomenon of “fully vaccinated” and “fully boosted” people having “breakthrough” infections compared to the unvaccinated is a CONSEQUENCE of the vaccine. The reason these people can, apparently, suffer sequential “breakthrough infections,” the majority occurring within the first week of vaccination, is because it is evidence of the artificial infection caused BY the vaccine. There is no protection afforded against a repeat of the same thing because the measly antibody production cannot stop a doctor from giving subsequent injections of a product having EXACTLY the same primary mechanism of action. Once injected, the “vaccine,” by design, will not be detected by the innate immune system until AFTER it has invaded healthy cells, infected them with the C19 RNA, hijacked their protein synthesis system, made large amounts of spike protein, finally resulting in innate immune system attack on those cells.

In the end, the victim of this deliberate medical malpractice will suffer repeated waves of inflammatory immune response against tissues throughout his body, all successively compounding the damage.

And when, at last, he is incapacitated or killed by it, tests will show an antibody response and PCR will show the presence of C19 RNA and his death will be falsely attributed to the native C19 virus.

This is also why the number of excess deaths from seemingly a broad array of causes has skyrocketed over the ~15 months since the introduction of the “vaccines” compared to the previous year of C19, which was no different than the previous four years.

Study different age groups and professional groups in terms of when they were first injected with these products and you’ll see at three things:

1. The overall increase in excess deaths for these groups compared to those groups who had not yet begun to be injected.

2. A stark difference within each group in excess deaths between “vaccinated” and unvaccinated.

3. An increase in the number of excess deaths due to conditions atypical of their age group compared to unvaccinated and for all in years prior to the introduction of these productions.

Charting the rise of excess deaths and age-atypical excess deaths within groups will be a positive ID of who, in those groups, had been vaccinated.

Also charting against the number of different injections within each age group will show excess deaths and disability definitive of vaccination status and frequency compared to never vaccinated and the status quo antes the start date of the products’ introduction.